A defence of the Divine right of infant-baptism Wherein are consider'd, the consequences of embracing anti-pedobaptism. The antiquity of the practice of baptising infants. The covenant-interest of the infant children of believers; and the argument grounded on this for their title to baptism. The texts of Scripture, alledg'd as confirming evidences of their title. And the lawfulness of the mode of administring baptism by affusion or sprinkling. Being in reply to Dr. John Gill's book, intitled, The Divine right of infant-baptism examined and disproved. And in vindication of the late Mr. Jonathan Dickinson's Brief illustration and confirmation of the Divine right of infant-baptism. /