CMS Innovation Center Health Care Innovation Awards : evaluation plan /
The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation within the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has funded 108 Health Care Innovation Awards, funded through the Affordable Care Act, for applicants who proposed compelling new models of service delivery or payment improvements that promi...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Corporate Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Electronic eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Santa Monica, CA :
RAND,
2013.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Connect to this title online (unlimited users allowed) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | b3182921 | ||
| 003 | CStclU | ||
| 005 | 20240524050223.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr cnu---unuuu | ||
| 008 | 140105s2013 caua ob 000 0 eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780833083043 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 083308304X |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 027 | |a RAND/RR-376-CMS | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)jdda867481361 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)867481361 | ||
| 037 | |a 22573/ctt4cxwm0 |b JSTOR | ||
| 040 | |a RSM |b eng |e pn |c RSM |d JSTOR |d OCLCQ |d YDXCP |d OCLCQ |d TEF |d COO |d OCLCQ |d UAB |d LND |d OTZ |d MERER |d VT2 |d IOG |d VFL |d LOA |d ICG |d OCLCF |d OCLCO |d U3W |d OCLCO |d ICN |d OCLCO |d ERL |d OCLCO |d WYU |d UWO |d OCLCO |d NJT |d OCLCO |d OCLCA |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCL |d OCLCO |d OCLCL |d OCLCQ |d OCLCL | ||
| 043 | |a n-us--- | ||
| 049 | |a STAW | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a RA412.2 | |
| 066 | |c (Q | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Berry, Sandra H., |d 1949- |e author. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a CMS Innovation Center Health Care Innovation Awards : |b evaluation plan / |c Sandra H. Berry [and twenty others]. |
| 246 | 3 | |a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Innovation Center Health Care Innovation Awards | |
| 264 | 1 | |a Santa Monica, CA : |b RAND, |c 2013. | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (133 pages) | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a "RAND Corporation." | ||
| 500 | |a "This research was conducted by RAND Health"--Preface | ||
| 500 | |a Title from title screen (viewed August 9, 2013). | ||
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references. | ||
| 505 | 0 | |a Background, evaluation goals, and overview -- Strategies for evaluation at three levels -- Evaluation dimensions, measures, and designs -- Summary evaluation and decision strategy -- Appendix A: Relationship of evaluation dimensions to HCIA evaluation questions -- Appendix B: Sample size requirements for estimating HCIA impacts. | |
| 520 | |a The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation within the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has funded 108 Health Care Innovation Awards, funded through the Affordable Care Act, for applicants who proposed compelling new models of service delivery or payment improvements that promise to deliver better health, better health care, and lower costs through improved quality of care for Medicare, Medicaid, and Children⁰́₉s Health Insurance Program enrollees. CMS is also interested in learning how new models would affect subpopulations of beneficiaries (e.g., those eligible for Medicare and Medicaid and complex patients) who have unique characteristics or health care needs that could be related to poor outcomes. In addition, the initiative seeks to identify new models of workforce development and deployment, as well as models that can be rapidly deployed and have the promise of sustainability. This report describes a strategy for evaluating the results. The goal for the evaluation design process is to create standardized approaches for answering key questions that can be customized to similar groups of awardees and that allow for rapid and comparable assessment across awardees. The evaluation plan envisions that data collection and analysis will be carried out on three levels: at the level of the individual awardee, at the level of the awardee grouping, and as a summary evaluation that includes all awardees. Key dimensions for the evaluation framework include implementation effectiveness, program effectiveness, workforce issues, impact on priority populations, and context. The ultimate goal is to identify strategies that can be employed widely to lower cost while improving care. | ||
| 588 | 0 | |a Online resource. | |
| 610 | 2 | 0 | |a Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (U.S.) |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (U.S.) |2 fast |
| 650 | 0 | |a Health services administration |x Awards |z United States. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Medicaid. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Medical care |x Awards |z United States. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Medicare. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Benchmarking (Management) | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Organizational change. | |
| 650 | 2 | |a Benchmarking | |
| 650 | 2 | |a Cost Savings |x methods | |
| 650 | 2 | |a Organizational Innovation | |
| 650 | 2 | |a Program Evaluation |x methods | |
| 650 | 2 | |a Quality of Health Care | |
| 650 | 2 | |a Medicaid | |
| 650 | 2 | |a Medicare | |
| 650 | 7 | |a MEDICAL |x Evidence-Based Medicine. |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Organizational change |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Benchmarking (Management) |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Medicaid |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Medicare |2 fast | |
| 651 | 7 | |a United States |2 fast |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Concannon, Thomas W., |e author. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Morganti, Kristy Gonzalez, |e author. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Auerbach, David I., |e author. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Beckett, Megan K., |e author. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chen, Peggy G., |e author. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Farley, Donna O., |e author. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Han, Bing, |e author. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Harris, Katherine M., |e author. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jones, Spencer S., |e author. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Liu, Hangsheng, |e author. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lovejoy, Susan L., |e author. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Marsh, Terry, |e author. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Martsolf, Grant, |e author. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nelson, Christopher D., |e author. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Okeke, Edward N., |e author. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pearson, Marjorie L., |e author. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pillemer, Francesca, |e author. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sorbero, Melony E. S., |e author. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Towe, Vivian L., |e author. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Weinick, Robin M., |e author. | |
| 710 | 2 | |a RAND Health. | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Rand Corporation. | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (U.S.) | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/j.ctt5hhtcm |z Connect to this title online (unlimited users allowed) |t 0 |
| 880 | |6 520-00/(Q |a The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation within the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has funded 108 Health Care Innovation Awards, funded through the Affordable Care Act, for applicants who proposed compelling new models of service delivery or payment improvements that promise to deliver better health, better health care, and lower costs through improved quality of care for Medicare, Medicaid, and Childrenѓ́ʻ⁺ѓє́#x9C;s Health Insurance Program enrollees. CMS is also interested in learning how new models would affect subpopulations of beneficiaries (e.g., those eligible for Medicare and Medicaid and complex patients) who have unique characteristics or health care needs that could be related to poor outcomes. In addition, the initiative seeks to identify new models of workforce development and deployment, as well as models that can be rapidly deployed and have the promise of sustainability. This report describes a strategy for evaluating the results. The goal for the evaluation design process is to create standardized approaches for answering key questions that can be customized to similar groups of awardees and that allow for rapid and comparable assessment across awardees. The evaluation plan envisions that data collection and analysis will be carried out on three levels: at the level of the individual awardee, at the level of the awardee grouping, and as a summary evaluation that includes all awardees. Key dimensions for the evaluation framework include implementation effectiveness, program effectiveness, workforce issues, impact on priority populations, and context. The ultimate goal is to identify strategies that can be employed widely to lower cost while improving care. | ||
| 907 | |a .b31829211 |b 240528 |c 181114 | ||
| 998 | |a uww |b |c m |d z |e l |f eng |g cau |h 0 | ||
| 919 | |a .ulebk |b 2024-02-15 | ||
| 917 | |a JSTOR Open Access Ebooks | ||
| 999 | f | f | |i bf30280a-4b9b-54f8-a3a9-4c2812892db8 |s 2209d71c-0737-54c0-ad9d-60fe6ba1a8b0 |t 0 |