Assembling arguments : multimodal rhetoric and scientific discourse /
"Scientific arguments--and indeed arguments in most disciplines--depend on visuals and other nontextual elements; however, most models of argumentation typically neglect these important resources. In Assembling Arguments, Jonathan Buehl offers a concentrated study of scientific argumentation th...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Columbia :
University of South Carolina Press,
[2016]
|
| Series: | Studies in rhetoric/communication.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Connect to this title online (unlimited users allowed) |
Table of Contents:
- Part 1. Motives and methods for a multimodal rhetoric of science. Scientific visuals : rhetorical potential and rhetorical problems
- Toward a multimodal rhetoric of science
- Part 2. X-ray diffraction crystallography. From agreements to images : the rhetorical foundations of x-ray crystallography
- From images to arguments : assembling a multimodal argument in 1912
- From arguments to alternatives : rhetorical recirculation in 1912
- Part 3. Seafloor spreading. Mapping motion through magnetism : the rhetorical conception of the Vine-Matthews-Morley hypothesis
- From artifact to argument to object of agreement : the assembly and circulation of magnetic anomaly maps
- From profiles to timelines : the assembly and circulation of world-moving arguments
- Part 4. The twilight zone between clouds and aerosols. Naming the sky : rhetorical definitions and atmospheric science
- Revising the twilight zone : the assembly of a multimodal scientific dissociation
- Tracking the twilight zone : the circulation of a multimodal dissociation
- Part 5. Image editors and moving Images : technologies of argumentation
- Learning from the era when science met photoshop : toward an ethical rhetoric of the digital scientific image
- Integrating moving images into scientific arguments : from "pseudomovies" to "see movie 1"
- Assembling lessons from assembling arguments.