The strength in numbers : the new science of team science /

"Once upon a time, it was the lone scientist who achieved brilliant breakthroughs. No longer. Today, science is done in teams of as many as hundreds of researchers who may be scattered across continents and represent a range of hierarchies. These collaborations can be powerful, but they demand...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bozeman, Barry (Author), Youtie, Jan L. (Author)
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: Princeton, New Jersey : Princeton University Press, [2017]
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this title online (unlimited users allowed)

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 i 4500
001 b3581466
003 CStclU
005 20240524050223.0
006 m o d
007 cr bnu|||unuuu
008 170919s2017 njua ob 001 0 eng d
019 |a jeba1175631356 
020 |a 9781400888610  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 1400888611  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |z 9780691174068  |q (print) 
020 |z 0691174067  |q (print) 
035 |a (OCoLC)jeba1004271375 
035 |a (OCoLC)1004271375  |z (OCoLC)1175631356 
037 |a 22573/ctvc653f0  |b JSTOR 
037 |a 9452409  |b IEEE 
040 |a N$T  |b eng  |e rda  |e pn  |c N$T  |d N$T  |d OCLCF  |d IDEBK  |d EBLCP  |d NHM  |d IDB  |d CNCGM  |d V5E  |d OCLCQ  |d INT  |d DEGRU  |d OCLCQ  |d WYU  |d OTZ  |d OCLCQ  |d JSTOR  |d UKAHL  |d OCLCQ  |d UX1  |d OCLCQ  |d IEEEE  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d YWS  |d OCLCL 
049 |a STAW 
050 4 |a Q180.55.G77  |b B69 2017e 
080 |a 303.823.4  |b B69 
100 1 |a Bozeman, Barry,  |e author. 
245 1 4 |a The strength in numbers :  |b the new science of team science /  |c Barry Bozeman and Jan Youtie. 
264 1 |a Princeton, New Jersey :  |b Princeton University Press,  |c [2017] 
300 |a 1 online resource (viii, 229 pages) :  |b illustrations 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 199-221) and index. 
505 0 |a 1. Research collaboration and team science: witnessing the revolution -- 2. Routine and not-so-routine: classifying research collaboration outcomes -- 3. The literature on research collaboration and team science -- 4. Thinking systematically about research effectiveness -- 5. Research collaboration effectiveness: in their own words -- 6. "Decision making in collaborative research teams" -- 7. Enhancing the effectiveness of research teams: the "consultative collaboration" strategy -- Appendix 1. Data sources, methods, and research procedures -- Appendix 2. Propositional literature table. 
520 |a "Once upon a time, it was the lone scientist who achieved brilliant breakthroughs. No longer. Today, science is done in teams of as many as hundreds of researchers who may be scattered across continents and represent a range of hierarchies. These collaborations can be powerful, but they demand new ways of thinking about scientific research. When three hundred people make a discovery, who gets credit? How can all collaborators' concerns be adequately addressed? Why do certain STEM collaborations succeed while others fail? Focusing on the nascent science of team science, The Strength in Numbers synthesizes the results of the most far-reaching study to date on collaboration among university scientists to provide answers to such questions. Drawing on a national survey with responses from researchers at more than one hundred universities, anonymous web posts, archival data, and extensive interviews with active scientists and engineers in over a dozen STEM disciplines, Barry Bozeman and Jan Youtie set out a framework to characterize different types of collaboration and their likely outcomes. They also develop a model to define research effectiveness, which assesses factors internal and external to collaborations. They advance what they have found to be the gold standard of science collaborations: consultative collaboration management. This strategy--which codifies methods of consulting all team members on a study's key points and incorporates their preferences and values--empowers managers of STEM collaborations to optimize the likelihood of their effectiveness. The Strength in Numbers is a milestone in the science of team science and an indispensable guide for scientists interested in maximizing collaborative success."--Provided by publisher 
588 0 |a Online resource; title from digital title page (EbscoHost platform, viewed December 6, 2017). 
650 0 |a Research teams. 
650 0 |a Group work in research. 
650 0 |a Research  |x Methodology. 
650 0 |a Science  |x Methodology. 
650 7 |a teams.  |2 aat 
650 7 |a SCIENCE  |x Study & Teaching.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a SCIENCE  |x Research & Methodology.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Research  |x Methodology  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Science  |x Methodology  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Group work in research  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Research teams  |2 fast 
653 |a Academic department. 
653 |a Academician. 
653 |a Adobe. 
653 |a Anecdote. 
653 |a Assistant professor. 
653 |a Associate professor. 
653 |a Author. 
653 |a Award. 
653 |a Career. 
653 |a Case study. 
653 |a Clinical trial. 
653 |a Collaboration. 
653 |a Commercialization. 
653 |a Communication. 
653 |a Competition. 
653 |a Competitiveness. 
653 |a Consideration. 
653 |a Convenience. 
653 |a Decision-making. 
653 |a Dissemination. 
653 |a Distrust. 
653 |a Division of labour. 
653 |a Doctor of Philosophy. 
653 |a Economics. 
653 |a Economist. 
653 |a Effectiveness. 
653 |a Efficacy. 
653 |a Engineering. 
653 |a Entrepreneurship. 
653 |a Finding. 
653 |a Funding of science. 
653 |a Funding. 
653 |a Graduate school. 
653 |a Guideline. 
653 |a Human Relations (journal). 
653 |a Human capital. 
653 |a Human resources. 
653 |a Human subject research. 
653 |a Illustration. 
653 |a Institution. 
653 |a Intellectual property. 
653 |a Interaction. 
653 |a Interview. 
653 |a Knowledge economy. 
653 |a Lead author. 
653 |a Level of analysis. 
653 |a Literature review. 
653 |a Literature. 
653 |a Matthew effect. 
653 |a Measurement. 
653 |a Medical research. 
653 |a Mentorship. 
653 |a Motivation. 
653 |a National Science Foundation. 
653 |a Organizational culture. 
653 |a Percentage. 
653 |a Personality clash. 
653 |a Pharmaceutical drug. 
653 |a Postdoctoral researcher. 
653 |a Principal investigator. 
653 |a Profession. 
653 |a Project team. 
653 |a Project. 
653 |a Public policy. 
653 |a Public value. 
653 |a Publication. 
653 |a Qualitative research. 
653 |a Questionnaire. 
653 |a Reputation. 
653 |a Requirement. 
653 |a Research and development. 
653 |a Research center. 
653 |a Research ethics. 
653 |a Respondent. 
653 |a Response rate (survey). 
653 |a Result. 
653 |a Science of team science. 
653 |a Science policy. 
653 |a Science studies. 
653 |a Scientist. 
653 |a Scientometrics. 
653 |a Sexual harassment. 
653 |a Sharing. 
653 |a Skill. 
653 |a Social capital. 
653 |a Social dynamics. 
653 |a Social exchange theory. 
653 |a Social science. 
653 |a Suggestion. 
653 |a Supervisor. 
653 |a Team leader. 
653 |a Team management. 
653 |a Technology transfer. 
653 |a Technology. 
653 |a Theory. 
653 |a Thesis. 
653 |a Thought. 
653 |a Transaction cost. 
653 |a Virtual collaboration. 
653 |a Writing. 
700 1 |a Youtie, Jan L.,  |e author. 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Bozeman, Barry.  |t Strength in numbers.  |d Princeton, New Jersey : Princeton University Press, [2017]  |z 9780691174068  |w (DLC) 2017951861  |w (OCoLC)983824968 
856 4 0 |u https://login.libproxy.scu.edu/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctvc77bn7  |z Connect to this title online (unlimited users allowed)  |t 0 
907 |a .b35814664  |b 240528  |c 200113 
998 |a uww  |b    |c m  |d z   |e l  |f eng  |g nju  |h 4 
919 |a .ulebk  |b 2024-02-15 
917 |a JSTOR EBA Program 
999 f f |i c1c8ab2e-560d-555b-b569-fc3fef97a1ce  |s 70a709bf-b4a0-54b9-b10b-a4632281fc83  |t 0