A handbook on multi-attribute decision-making methods

A handbook on multi-attribute decision-making methods /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bozorg-Haddad, Omid, 1974- (Author), Zolghadr-Asli, Babak (Author), Loaiciga, Hugo A. (Author)
Corporate Author: ProQuest (Firm)
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, [2021]
Series:Wiley series in operations research and management science
Subjects:
Multiple criteria decision making.
Online Access:Connect to this title online (unlimited simultaneous users allowed; 325 uses per year)

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a2200000 i 4500
001 b3825322
003 CStclU
005 20210715145800.8
006 m o d
007 cr |||||||||||
008 200730s2021 nju ob 001 0 eng
010 |a 2020034050 
020 |a 9781119563501  |q (electronic book) 
020 |a 111956350X  |q (electronic book) 
020 |a 9781119563471  |q (adobe pdf) 
020 |a 111956347X  |q (adobe pdf) 
020 |a 9781119563389  |q (epub) 
020 |a 1119563380  |q (epub) 
020 |z 9781119563495  |q (cloth) 
035 |a (DLC)ebc6509828 
040 |a NhCcYBP  |c NhCcYBP 
042 |a pcc 
050 4 |a T57.95  |b .B69 2021 
082 0 0 |a 658.4/03  |2 23 
100 1 |a Bozorg-Haddad, Omid,  |d 1974-  |e author. 
245 1 2 |a A handbook on multi-attribute decision-making methods /  |c Omid Bozorg-Haddad, Babak Zolghadr-Asli, Hugo A. Loáiciga. 
264 1 |a Hoboken, NJ :  |b Wiley,  |c [2021] 
300 |a 1 online resource. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 0 |a Wiley series in operations research and management science 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index. 
505 0 0 |a Machine generated contents note:   |g 1.  |t Overview of the Art of Decision-making --   |g 1.1.  |t Introduction --   |g 1.2.  |t Classification of MADM Methods --   |g 1.2.1.  |t Preference Evaluation Mechanism --   |g 1.2.2.  |t Attributes' Interactions --   |g 1.2.3.  |t Mathematical Nature of Attributes' Values --   |g 1.2.3.1.  |t Deterministic Vs. Nondeterministic --   |g 1.2.3.2.  |t Fuzzy Vs. Crisp --   |g 1.2.4.  |t Number of Involved Decision-makers --   |g 1.3.  |t Brief Chronicle of MADM Methods --   |g 1.4.  |t Conclusion --   |t References --   |g 2.  |t Simple Weighting Methods: Weighted Sum and Weighted Product Methods --   |g 2.1.  |t Introduction --   |g 2.2.  |t Weighted Sum Method --   |g 2.2.1.  |t Step 1: Defining the Decision-making Problem --   |g 2.2.2.  |t Step 2: Normalizing the Elements of the Decision-matrix --   |g 2.2.3.  |t Step 3: Aggregating the Preference of Alternatives --   |g 2.3.  |t Weighted Product Method --   |g 2.4.  |t Conclusion --   |t References --   |g 3.  |t Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) --   |g 3.1.  |t Introduction --   |g 3.2.  |t Hierarchical Structure --   |g 3.3.  |t Pairwise Comparison --   |g 3.4.  |t Inconsistency --   |g 3.5.  |t Quadruple Axioms of the AHP --   |g 3.6.  |t Stepwise Description of the AHP Method --   |g 3.6.1.  |t Step 1: Defining the Decision-making Problem --   |g 3.6.2.  |t Step 2: Performing the Pairwise Comparison Through the Hierarchical Structure --   |g 3.6.3.  |t Step 3: Estimating the Preference Value Vectors --   |g 3.6.4.  |t Step 4: Synthesizing and Computing the Overall Preference Value of Alternatives --   |g 3.6.5.  |t Step 5: Evaluating the Results' Rationality and Selecting the Best Alternative --   |g 3.7.  |t Conclusion --   |t References --   |g 4.  |t Analytic Network Process (ANP) --   |g 4.1.  |t Introduction --   |g 4.2.  |t Network Vs. Hierarchy Structure --   |g 4.3.  |t Stepwise Instruction to the ANP Method --   |g 4.3.1.  |t Step 1: Defining the Decision-making Problem --   |g 4.3.2.  |t Step 2: Conducting a Pairwise Comparison of the Elements of the Decision-making Problem --   |g 4.3.3.  |t Step 3: Forming the Supermatrix --   |g 4.3.4.  |t Step 4: Computing the Weighted Supermatrix --   |g 4.3.5.  |t Step 5: Computing the Global Priority Vectors and Choosing the Most Suitable Alternative --   |g 4.4.  |t Conclusion --   |t References --   |g 5.  |t Best-Worst Method (BWM) --   |g 5.1.  |t Introduction --   |g 5.2.  |t Basic Principles of the BWM --   |g 5.3.  |t Stepwise Description of the BWM --   |g 5.3.1.  |t Step 1: Defining the Decision-Making Problem --   |g 5.3.2.  |t Step 2: Determining the Reference Criteria --   |g 5.3.3.  |t Step 3: Pairwise Comparisons --   |g 5.3.4.  |t Step 4: Computing the Optimal Weights --   |g 5.3.5.  |t Step 5: Measuring the Inconsistency of Decision-Makers Judgments --   |g 5.4.  |t Conclusion --   |t References --   |g 6.  |t TOPSIS --   |g 6.1.  |t Introduction --   |g 6.2.  |t Stepwise Description of the TOPSIS Method --   |g 6.2.1.  |t Step 1: Establishing the Formation of the Decision-making Problem --   |g 6.2.2.  |t Step 2: Normalizing the Element of the Decision-matrix --   |g 6.2.3.  |t Step 3: Computing the Weighted Normalized Preference Values --   |g 6.2.4.  |t Step 4: Defining the Reference Alternatives --   |g 6.2.5.  |t Step 5: Calculation of the Separation Measure --   |g 6.2.6.  |t Step 6: Computing the Relative Closeness to the Ideal Solution --   |g 6.2.7.  |t Step 7: Ranking the Alternatives --   |g 6.3.  |t Common Misinterpretation of TOPSIS Results --   |g 6.4.  |t Conclusion --   |t References --   |g 7.  |t VIKOR --   |g 7.1.  |t Introduction --   |g 7.2.  |t Stepwise Description of the VIKOR Method --   |g 7.2.1.  |t Step 1: Modeling the Decision-Making Problem --   |g 7.2.2.  |t Step 2: Normalizing the Element of the Decision-Matrix --   |g 7.2.3.  |t Step 3: Compute the "Group Satisfaction" and "Individual Regret" Parameters --   |g 7.2.4.  |t Step 4: Computing the VIKOR Parameter --   |g 7.2.5.  |t Step 5: Ranking the Alternatives --   |g 7.2.6.  |t Step 6: Determining the Compromise Solution --   |g 7.3.  |t Conclusion --   |t References --   |g 8.  |t ELECTRE --   |g 8.1.  |t Introduction --   |g 8.2.  |t Brief History of the ELECTRE Family of Methods --   |g 8.3.  |t ELECTRE I --   |g 8.4.  |t ELECTRE II --   |g 8.5.  |t ELECTRE III --   |g 8.6.  |t ELECTRE IV --   |g 8.7.  |t Conclusion --   |t References --   |g 9.  |t PROMETHEE --   |g 9.1.  |t Introduction --   |g 9.2.  |t Common Ground of the PROMETHEE Family --   |g 9.2.1.  |t Stage 1: Construction of the Generalized Criteria --   |g 9.2.2.  |t Stage 2: Mapping the Outrank Relation on the Set of Feasible Alternatives --   |g 9.2.3.  |t Stage 3: Evaluation the Relation Among the Feasible Alternatives --   |g 9.3.  |t PROMETHEE I --   |g 9.4.  |t PROMETHEE II --   |g 9.5.  |t PROMETHEE III --   |g 9.6.  |t PROMETHEE IV --   |g 9.7.  |t Conclusion --   |t References --   |g 10.  |t Superiority and Inferiority Ranking (SIR) --   |g 10.1.  |t Introduction --   |g 10.2.  |t Foundational Bases of the SIR Method --   |g 10.3.  |t Stepwise Description of the SIR Method --   |g 10.3.1.  |t Step 1: Establishing the Formation of the Decision-Making Problem --   |g 10.3.2.  |t Step 2: Computing the Superiority and Inferiority Scores --   |g 10.3.3.  |t Step 3: Forming the Superiority and Inferiority Matrices --   |g 10.3.4.  |t Step 4: Superiority and Inferiority Flows --   |g 10.3.5.  |t Step 5: Ranking the Set of Feasible Alternatives --   |g 10.4.  |t Conclusion --   |t References --   |g 11.  |t PAPRIKA --   |g 11.1.  |t Introduction --   |g 11.2.  |t Stepwise Description of PAPRIKA --   |g 11.2.1.  |t Step 1: Defining the Decision-Making Problem --   |g 11.2.2.  |t Step 2: Identifying the Nondominated Pairs of Alternative --   |g 11.2.3.  |t Step 3: Ranking the Pairs of Nondominated Solutions --   |g 11.2.4.  |t Step 4: Calculating the Complete Ranking of Alternatives --   |g 11.3.  |t Conclusion --   |t References --   |g 12.  |t Gray Relational Analysis --   |g 12.1.  |t Introduction --   |g 12.2.  |t Gray System Theory: The Foundation and Basic Principles --   |g 12.3.  |t Gray Relational Modeling --   |g 12.4.  |t Gray Theory in Relation to MADM --   |g 12.5.  |t Conclusion --   |t References --   |g A.  |t Weight Assignment Approaches --   |g A.1.  |t Subjective Approach: Weighted Least Squares --   |g A.2.  |t Objective Approach: Multiobjective Programming Model --   |t References --   |g B.  |t Benchmark Example and a Comparison between Objective- and Subjective-Based MADM Methods --   |t References. 
533 |a Electronic reproduction.  |b Ann Arbor, MI  |n Available via World Wide Web. 
588 0 |a Print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed. 
650 0 |a Multiple criteria decision making. 
700 1 |a Zolghadr-Asli, Babak,  |e author. 
700 1 |a Loaiciga, Hugo A.,  |e author. 
710 2 |a ProQuest (Firm) 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Bozorg-Haddad, Omid, 1974-  |t A handbook on multi-attribute decision-making methods.  |d Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 2021  |z 9781119563495  |w (DLC) 2020034049 
856 4 0 |u https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/santaclara/detail.action?docID=6509828  |z Connect to this title online (unlimited simultaneous users allowed; 325 uses per year)  |t 0 
907 |a .b38253227  |b 211018  |c 211018 
998 |a uww  |b    |c m  |d z   |e l  |f eng  |g nju  |h 2 
917 |a GOBI ProQuest DDA 
919 |a .ulebk  |b 2020-07-09 
999 f f |i 38ef47de-f8c6-5ed8-8d79-ccaf3fea975d  |s 907c7423-3231-50a6-bbc0-ff3cc86a6d94  |t 0 

Similar Items