Opinion of the Hon. Daniel Webster upon the validity of the act of 1821, granting a new trial in the action, Heman Allen vs. Silas Hathaway and Uziel Pierson.

Similar Items

• Remarks of Mr. Allen's counsel upon the petition of Silas Hathaway, praying for a new trial, &c.
  by: Allen, Heman, 1779-1852
  Published: (1822)
• State of Vermont To the honorable the Court of Chancery to be holden at Middlebury in and for the county of Addison by adjournment on the Tuesday being the 29th day of June, in the year of our Lord 1802.
  by: Allen, Ira, 1751-1814
• The trial at large o [sic] Arthur O'Connor, Esq. John Binns, John Allen, Jeremiah Leary, and James Coigley, for high treason, before Judge Buller, &c. under a special commission, at Maidstone, in the county of Kent. Taken in short hand.
• The trial at large of Arthur O'Connor, Esq : John Binns, John Allen, Jeremiah Leary, and James Coigley, for high treason, before Judge Buller, &c. under a special commission, at Maidstone, in the county of Kent. Taken in short hand.
• An authentic and verbatim report of the cause Rutter v. Chapman, tried at the South Lancashire Assizes, August, 1839 : together with the whole of the argument on the bill of exceptions before the judges in the exchequer chamber.
  by: Rutter, William Smalley